Description
Cybersecurity AI (CAI) is an open-source framework for building and deploying AI-powered offensive and defensive automation. Versions 0.5.9 and below are vulnerable to Command Injection through the run_ssh_command_with_credentials() function, which is available to AI agents. Only password and command inputs are escaped in run_ssh_command_with_credentials to prevent shell injection; while username, host and port values are injectable. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-202335
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
The vulnerability described in EUVD-2025-202335 pertains to a Command Injection flaw in the Cybersecurity AI (CAI) framework, specifically affecting versions 0.5.9 and below. The run_ssh_command_with_credentials() function, which is accessible to AI agents, fails to properly sanitize the username, host, and port inputs, making them susceptible to injection attacks.
Severity Evaluation:
- Base Score: 9.7 (CVSS:3.1)
- Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The high base score indicates a critical vulnerability due to the following factors:
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Network-based attack, meaning it can be exploited remotely.
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity, suggesting that the attack does not require specialized conditions.
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No privileges are required to exploit the vulnerability.
- User Interaction (UI:R): Requires user interaction, which slightly mitigates the risk.
- Scope (S:C): Change in scope, indicating that the vulnerability can affect components beyond the initial security scope.
- Confidentiality (C:H), Integrity (I:H), and Availability (A:H): High impact on all three CIA triad components.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Command Injection: An attacker can inject malicious commands through the username, host, or port parameters, leading to arbitrary command execution on the target system.
- SSH Command Manipulation: By manipulating the SSH command inputs, an attacker can gain unauthorized access or execute commands with elevated privileges.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted Inputs: An attacker can craft specific inputs to the
run_ssh_command_with_credentials()function to inject commands. - Automated Scripts: Automated scripts can be used to exploit the vulnerability, especially in environments where AI agents frequently interact with the CAI framework.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Systems running the Cybersecurity AI (CAI) framework versions 0.5.9 and below.
- Environments where AI agents have access to the
run_ssh_command_with_credentials()function.
Software Versions:
- CAI versions ≤ 0.5.9
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Input Sanitization: Ensure that all inputs to the
run_ssh_command_with_credentials()function are properly sanitized and validated. - Access Control: Restrict access to the
run_ssh_command_with_credentials()function to trusted AI agents only. - Monitoring: Implement monitoring and logging to detect and respond to any suspicious activities related to SSH command execution.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Update Software: Upgrade to a patched version of the CAI framework once available.
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities in other parts of the framework.
- Security Training: Provide training to developers and administrators on secure coding practices and input validation techniques.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations and individuals using the CAI framework within the European Union. Given the framework's open-source nature and its use in both offensive and defensive automation, the impact could be widespread:
- Data Breaches: Unauthorized command execution can lead to data breaches and loss of sensitive information.
- System Compromise: Attackers can gain control over systems, leading to further exploitation and potential disruption of services.
- Compliance Issues: Organizations may face compliance issues with regulations such as GDPR if sensitive data is compromised.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Function:
run_ssh_command_with_credentials() - Inputs: Username, host, port, password, and command
- Sanitization: Only password and command inputs are escaped; username, host, and port are injectable.
Exploitation Example:
# Example of a vulnerable function call
run_ssh_command_with_credentials(username="admin; rm -rf /", host="example.com", port="22", password="securepassword", command="ls")
Mitigation Code Example:
import re
def sanitize_input(input_string):
# Example sanitization function
return re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '', input_string)
def run_ssh_command_with_credentials(username, host, port, password, command):
# Sanitize inputs
username = sanitize_input(username)
host = sanitize_input(host)
port = sanitize_input(port)
password = sanitize_input(password)
command = sanitize_input(command)
# Proceed with the SSH command execution
# ...
References:
Aliases:
- CVE-2025-67511
- GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h
Assigner:
- GitHub_M
ENISA IDs:
- Product: 3870bae8-d324-3f04-8ae1-b04990a53939
- Vendor: 009eabd9-de61-395e-b8ab-f06b42fd376c
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and effectively, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with command injection and ensure the security of their AI-powered automation frameworks.