Description
Vision UI is a collection of enterprise-grade, dependency-free modules for modern web projects. In versions 1.4.0 and below, the getSecureRandomInt function in security-kit versions prior to 3.5.0 (packaged in Vision-ui <= 1.4.0) contains a critical cryptographic weakness. Due to a silent 32-bit integer overflow in its internal masking logic, the function fails to produce a uniform distribution of random numbers when the requested range between min and max is larger than 2³². The root cause is the use of a 32-bit bitwise left-shift operation (<<) to generate a bitmask for the rejection sampling algorithm. This causes the mask to be incorrect for any range requiring 32 or more bits of entropy. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.0.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-23664
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Description:
The vulnerability in Vision UI, specifically in versions 1.4.0 and below, pertains to a critical cryptographic weakness in the getSecureRandomInt function within the security-kit module. This function fails to produce a uniform distribution of random numbers when the requested range between min and max exceeds 2³². The root cause is a 32-bit integer overflow in the internal masking logic, which uses a 32-bit bitwise left-shift operation (<<) to generate a bitmask for the rejection sampling algorithm.
Severity Evaluation:
The Base Score of 9.3 (CVSS:4.0) indicates a critical vulnerability. The scoring vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N highlights the following:
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Network-based attack.
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity required for exploitation.
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No privileges required.
- User Interaction (UI:N): No user interaction required.
- Confidentiality Impact (VC:H): High impact on confidentiality.
- Integrity Impact (VI:H): High impact on integrity.
- Availability Impact (VA:N): No impact on availability.
- Scope Change (SC:L): Low scope change.
- Scope Impact (SI:L): Low impact on scope.
- Secondary Attack Vector (SA:N): No secondary attack vector.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Network-based Attacks: An attacker could exploit this vulnerability over the network without needing physical access to the system.
- Remote Code Execution: If the random number generator is used in security-critical operations (e.g., generating cryptographic keys), an attacker could potentially predict the random values, leading to unauthorized access or data breaches.
Exploitation Methods:
- Predictable Random Numbers: An attacker could exploit the predictability of the random numbers to guess sensitive information, such as session tokens, cryptographic keys, or other security-critical values.
- Cryptographic Attacks: The weakness in the random number generation could be leveraged to break encryption schemes, leading to data exposure and integrity issues.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application using Vision UI versions 1.4.0 and below.
- Specifically, systems that rely on the
security-kitmodule versions prior to 3.5.0.
Software Versions:
- Vision UI <= 1.4.0
- Security-kit < 3.5.0
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to Vision UI version 1.5.0 or later, which includes the fix for this vulnerability.
- Patch Management: Ensure that all systems using the affected versions are patched promptly.
Long-term Strategies:
- Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews to identify and rectify similar cryptographic weaknesses.
- Security Audits: Regularly perform security audits on all critical components, especially those related to cryptographic operations.
- Monitoring: Implement continuous monitoring to detect any unusual activities that may indicate an exploitation attempt.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory Compliance:
- Organizations must ensure compliance with EU regulations such as GDPR, which mandates robust security measures to protect personal data.
- Non-compliance could result in significant fines and legal repercussions.
Industry-wide Implications:
- The vulnerability highlights the importance of secure cryptographic implementations in enterprise-grade software.
- It underscores the need for continuous vigilance and proactive security measures within the European cybersecurity community.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis:
- The vulnerability stems from a 32-bit integer overflow in the
getSecureRandomIntfunction's masking logic. - The bitwise left-shift operation (
<<) used to generate the bitmask fails to handle ranges requiring 32 or more bits of entropy, leading to incorrect masking and non-uniform random number distribution.
Code Snippet (Vulnerable):
function getSecureRandomInt(min, max) {
const range = max - min;
const bitmask = (1 << Math.ceil(Math.log2(range))) - 1;
let randomValue;
do {
randomValue = Math.floor(Math.random() * (bitmask + 1));
} while (randomValue > range);
return randomValue + min;
}
Fixed Code Snippet:
function getSecureRandomInt(min, max) {
const range = max - min;
const bitmask = (1n << BigInt(Math.ceil(Math.log2(range)))) - 1n;
let randomValue;
do {
randomValue = Number(BigInt.asUintN(64, crypto.getRandomValues(new BigUint64Array(1))[0]) & bitmask);
} while (randomValue > range);
return randomValue + min;
}
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and comprehensively, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with predictable random number generation and ensure the integrity and confidentiality of their systems.