Description
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 8824 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 11: else if (tag==11) //0x0B { // Fs if (len>6) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag11 incorrect length %i>6\n",len); double fval; curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-25677
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
The vulnerability described in EUVD-2025-25677 is a stack-based buffer overflow in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project's libbiosig library, versions 3.9.0 and the Master Branch (commit 35a819fa). This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by providing a specially crafted MFER file. The severity of this vulnerability is rated with a CVSS Base Score of 9.8, indicating a critical risk.
CVSS Base Score Vector Breakdown:
- AV:N (Network Vector): The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network.
- AC:L (Low Complexity): The attack requires low skill or resources to exploit.
- PR:N (No Privileges Required): No privileges are required to exploit the vulnerability.
- UI:N (No User Interaction): No user interaction is required to exploit the vulnerability.
- S:U (Unchanged): The scope of the vulnerability does not change.
- C:H (High Confidentiality Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a high impact on confidentiality.
- I:H (High Integrity Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a high impact on integrity.
- A:H (High Availability Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a high impact on availability.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
The primary attack vector involves an attacker crafting a malicious MFER file designed to trigger the buffer overflow in the MFER parsing functionality. This file can be delivered through various means, such as:
- Email Attachments: Sending the malicious file as an email attachment to unsuspecting users.
- Web Downloads: Hosting the file on a website and enticing users to download it.
- Network Shares: Placing the file on a shared network drive where it can be accessed by multiple users.
Once the malicious file is processed by the vulnerable libbiosig library, the buffer overflow can be exploited to execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to full system compromise.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
The vulnerability affects the following versions of libbiosig:
- libbiosig 3.9.0
- libbiosig Master Branch (commit 35a819fa)
Any system or application that uses these versions of the libbiosig library for MFER file parsing is at risk. This includes but is not limited to:
- Biomedical Research Software: Applications used in biomedical research that rely on libbiosig for data processing.
- Healthcare Systems: Medical devices and software that utilize libbiosig for signal processing.
- Academic Institutions: Research projects and educational tools that incorporate libbiosig.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
To mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability, the following actions are recommended:
- Update to a Patched Version: Ensure that all systems and applications using libbiosig are updated to a version that includes a fix for this vulnerability.
- Input Validation: Implement strict input validation for MFER files to detect and reject malformed or malicious files.
- Sandboxing: Run the libbiosig library in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of any potential exploitation.
- Network Segmentation: Segregate critical systems and limit network access to reduce the attack surface.
- User Education: Educate users about the risks of opening files from untrusted sources and the importance of verifying file integrity.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability in libbiosig poses a significant risk to the European cybersecurity landscape, particularly in sectors that rely heavily on biomedical data processing, such as healthcare and academic research. The potential for arbitrary code execution can lead to data breaches, system compromises, and disruptions in critical services. Organizations must prioritize patching and implementing robust security measures to protect against this threat.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Snippet:
else if (tag==11) //0x0B
{
// Fs
if (len>6) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag11 incorrect length %i>6\n",len);
double fval;
curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
Exploitation Details:
- The vulnerability occurs when the
lenparameter exceeds 6, leading to a buffer overflow. - An attacker can craft an MFER file with a
lenvalue greater than 6 to trigger the overflow. - The overflow can be exploited to overwrite adjacent memory, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
Detection and Monitoring:
- Implement logging and monitoring for unusual activity related to MFER file processing.
- Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) to detect anomalous network traffic that may indicate an exploitation attempt.
- Regularly audit and review code for similar vulnerabilities in other parsing functionalities.
Patching and Remediation:
- Review the code at line 8824 of
biosig.cand ensure proper bounds checking for thelenparameter. - Apply the patch provided by The Biosig Project or update to a version that includes the fix.
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and comprehensively, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of exploitation and protect their critical systems and data.