Description
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 8779 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 6: else if (tag==6) // 0x06 "number of sequences" { // NRec if (len>4) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag6 incorrect length %i>4\n",len); curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-25679
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
The vulnerability described in EUVD-2025-25679 is a stack-based buffer overflow in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project's libbiosig library, versions 3.9.0 and the Master Branch (commit 35a819fa). This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by providing a specially crafted MFER file. The severity of this vulnerability is rated with a CVSS Base Score of 9.8, indicating a critical risk.
CVSS Base Score Vector Breakdown:
- AV:N (Network Vector): The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network.
- AC:L (Low Complexity): The attack requires low skill or resources to exploit.
- PR:N (No Privileges Required): No special privileges are needed to exploit the vulnerability.
- UI:N (No User Interaction): No user interaction is required for the attack to succeed.
- S:U (Unchanged Scope): The vulnerability does not change the security scope.
- C:H (High Confidentiality Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a significant breach of confidentiality.
- I:H (High Integrity Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a significant breach of integrity.
- A:H (High Availability Impact): The vulnerability can lead to a significant breach of availability.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious File Upload: An attacker can upload a specially crafted MFER file to a system that processes these files using libbiosig.
- Phishing: An attacker can trick a user into downloading and opening a malicious MFER file.
- Supply Chain Attack: An attacker can compromise a legitimate source of MFER files, embedding malicious content that exploits this vulnerability.
Exploitation Methods:
- Buffer Overflow: The attacker crafts an MFER file with a tag value of 6 and a length greater than 4, causing a buffer overflow.
- Arbitrary Code Execution: By carefully crafting the payload, the attacker can execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to full system compromise.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- libbiosig 3.9.0
- libbiosig Master Branch (commit 35a819fa)
Affected Systems:
- Any system that uses the affected versions of libbiosig to process MFER files. This includes but is not limited to:
- Medical research systems
- Biometric data processing systems
- Any application or service that relies on libbiosig for MFER file parsing
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Patching: Apply the latest patches or updates provided by The Biosig Project.
- Input Validation: Implement strict input validation for MFER files to ensure they conform to expected formats and sizes.
- Sandboxing: Run MFER file processing in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of any potential exploitation.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review of the MFER parsing functionality to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities.
- Security Training: Educate developers on secure coding practices to prevent future buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all software dependencies are regularly updated to the latest versions.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability in libbiosig poses a significant risk to the European cybersecurity landscape, particularly in sectors that rely on biometric data processing, such as healthcare and research institutions. The potential for arbitrary code execution can lead to data breaches, system compromises, and loss of sensitive information. This underscores the need for robust cybersecurity measures and continuous monitoring of software dependencies.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Snippet:
else if (tag==6) // 0x06 "number of sequences"
{
// NRec
if (len>4) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag6 incorrect length %i>4\n",len);
curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
}
Technical Analysis:
- The vulnerability occurs when the length (
len) of the tag 6 data exceeds 4 bytes. Theifreadfunction readslenbytes intobuf, potentially causing a buffer overflow ifbufis not large enough to hold the data. - The
fprintfstatement provides a warning but does not prevent the buffer overflow.
Mitigation Code Example:
else if (tag==6) // 0x06 "number of sequences"
{
// NRec
if (len > 4) {
fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag6 incorrect length %i>4\n",len);
return -1; // Exit or handle error appropriately
}
curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
}
Additional Recommendations:
- Ensure that
bufis allocated with sufficient size to handle the maximum expected length. - Implement bounds checking on all input data to prevent buffer overflows.
- Use secure coding libraries and tools to automatically detect and prevent buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and implementing robust security measures, organizations can mitigate the risk and protect their systems from potential exploitation.