Description
Hoverfly is an open source API simulation tool. In versions 1.11.3 and prior, the middleware functionality in Hoverfly is vulnerable to command injection vulnerability at `/api/v2/hoverfly/middleware` endpoint due to insufficient validation and sanitization in user input. The vulnerability exists in the middleware management API endpoint `/api/v2/hoverfly/middleware`. This issue is born due to combination of three code level flaws: Insufficient Input Validation in middleware.go line 94-96; Unsafe Command Execution in local_middleware.go line 14-19; and Immediate Execution During Testing in hoverfly_service.go line 173. This allows an attacker to gain remote code execution (RCE) on any system running the vulnerable Hoverfly service. Since the input is directly passed to system commands without proper checks, an attacker can upload a malicious payload or directly execute arbitrary commands (including reverse shells) on the host server with the privileges of the Hoverfly process. Commit 17e60a9bc78826deb4b782dca1c1abd3dbe60d40 in version 1.12.0 disables the set middleware API by default, and subsequent changes to documentation make users aware of the security changes of exposing the set middleware API.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-27608
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview:
The vulnerability in Hoverfly, an open-source API simulation tool, involves a command injection flaw in the middleware management API endpoint /api/v2/hoverfly/middleware. This vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation and sanitization, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the host system.
Severity Evaluation:
The Base Score of 9.8 (CVSS:3.1) indicates a critical severity level. The vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H highlights the following:
- Attack Vector (AV): Network (N)
- Attack Complexity (AC): Low (L)
- Privileges Required (PR): None (N)
- User Interaction (UI): None (N)
- Scope (S): Unchanged (U)
- Confidentiality (C): High (H)
- Integrity (I): High (H)
- Availability (A): High (H)
This high severity score underscores the potential for significant impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected systems.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): An attacker can exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system.
- Malicious Payload Upload: Attackers can upload malicious payloads that get executed by the Hoverfly process.
- Reverse Shells: Attackers can establish reverse shells to gain persistent access to the host system.
Exploitation Methods:
- Direct Command Injection: By sending crafted input to the
/api/v2/hoverfly/middlewareendpoint, an attacker can inject commands that are executed by the system. - Payload Delivery: Attackers can deliver and execute malicious scripts or binaries through the vulnerable endpoint.
- Privilege Escalation: If the Hoverfly process runs with elevated privileges, an attacker can escalate their privileges on the host system.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- Hoverfly versions 1.11.3 and prior.
Affected Systems:
- Any system running the vulnerable versions of Hoverfly, including development, staging, and production environments.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to Hoverfly version 1.12.0 or later, where the set middleware API is disabled by default.
- Disable API: Manually disable the set middleware API if upgrading is not immediately possible.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Input Validation: Implement robust input validation and sanitization mechanisms.
- Least Privilege: Run the Hoverfly process with the least privileges necessary.
- Monitoring: Implement monitoring and logging to detect and respond to suspicious activities.
- Regular Updates: Keep all software dependencies up to date with the latest security patches.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory Compliance:
- Organizations must ensure compliance with regulations such as GDPR, which mandates robust security measures to protect personal data.
- Failure to address this vulnerability could result in data breaches, leading to regulatory fines and legal actions.
Critical Infrastructure:
- Critical infrastructure sectors using Hoverfly for API simulation must prioritize patching to prevent potential disruptions and breaches.
- The vulnerability poses a significant risk to the integrity and availability of critical services.
Supply Chain Security:
- Organizations must assess their supply chain for dependencies on vulnerable versions of Hoverfly and ensure that suppliers and partners also address the vulnerability.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Code Level Flaws:
- Insufficient Input Validation: In
middleware.goline 94-96, user input is not properly validated. - Unsafe Command Execution: In
local_middleware.goline 14-19, commands are executed without proper sanitization. - Immediate Execution During Testing: In
hoverfly_service.goline 173, commands are executed immediately during testing, increasing the risk of exploitation.
Mitigation Commit:
- Commit
17e60a9bc78826deb4b782dca1c1abd3dbe60d40in version 1.12.0 disables the set middleware API by default. - Documentation updates inform users about the security implications of exposing the set middleware API.
References:
- GitHub Security Advisory
- Mitigation Commit
- Additional Commit
- Source Code References
- Source Code References
- Source Code References
Conclusion: The command injection vulnerability in Hoverfly poses a critical risk to systems running vulnerable versions. Immediate mitigation through upgrading or disabling the affected API is essential. Organizations must also implement robust security practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.