Description
wolfSSH’s key exchange state machine can be manipulated to leak the client’s password in the clear, trick the client to send a bogus signature, or trick the client into skipping user authentication. This affects client applications with wolfSSH version 1.4.21 and earlier. Users of wolfSSH must update or apply the fix patch and it’s recommended to update credentials used. This fix is also recommended for wolfSSH server applications. While there aren’t any specific attacks on server applications, the same defect is present. Thanks to Aina Toky Rasoamanana of Valeo and Olivier Levillain of Telecom SudParis for the report.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2026-0990 (CVE-2025-14942)
wolfSSH Key Exchange State Machine Manipulation Vulnerability
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
EUVD-2026-0990 (CVE-2025-14942) is a critical vulnerability in wolfSSH, an open-source SSH implementation developed by wolfSSL. The flaw resides in the key exchange (KEX) state machine, which can be manipulated by an attacker to:
- Leak the client’s password in cleartext (credential exposure).
- Trick the client into sending a bogus signature (authentication bypass).
- Skip user authentication entirely (unauthorized access).
CVSS 4.0 Severity Analysis
The vulnerability has been assigned a Base Score of 9.4 (Critical) with the following vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/U:Red
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Exploitable remotely over a network.
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity; no specialized conditions required.
- Attack Requirements (AT:N): No additional requirements (e.g., user interaction beyond initial connection).
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No privileges needed.
- User Interaction (UI:P): Partial user interaction (e.g., initiating an SSH session).
- Vulnerable Component (VC:H): High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
- Subsequent System Impact (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H): High impact on downstream systems (e.g., lateral movement, privilege escalation).
- Exploit Maturity (U:Red): Exploit code likely available ("Red" indicates high likelihood of exploitation).
Severity Justification
The 9.4 Critical rating is justified due to:
- Remote exploitation without authentication.
- High impact on confidentiality (password leakage), integrity (bogus signatures), and availability (authentication bypass).
- Potential for lateral movement in compromised networks.
- Low attack complexity, increasing the likelihood of widespread exploitation.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Scenarios
Scenario 1: Password Leakage via State Machine Manipulation
- Attacker Positioning: The attacker acts as a malicious SSH server (e.g., via ARP spoofing, DNS poisoning, or rogue access point).
- Client Connection: A victim client initiates an SSH session to the attacker-controlled server.
- State Machine Exploitation: The attacker manipulates the KEX state machine to force the client into an unexpected state, causing it to transmit the password in cleartext before encryption is established.
- Credential Harvesting: The attacker captures the plaintext password for later use.
Scenario 2: Authentication Bypass via Bogus Signature
- Attacker-Controlled Server: The attacker impersonates a legitimate SSH server.
- Client Authentication Attempt: The victim client attempts to authenticate (e.g., via public-key or password).
- State Machine Tampering: The attacker forces the client to skip signature verification or accepts a malformed signature, allowing authentication without valid credentials.
- Unauthorized Access: The attacker gains access to the client’s session or downstream systems.
Scenario 3: Complete Authentication Skip
- Malicious Server Response: The attacker sends crafted KEX messages that trick the client into believing authentication is complete without performing it.
- Session Hijacking: The attacker can then inject commands or pivot into internal networks using the victim’s session.
Exploitation Requirements
- Network Access: The attacker must be able to intercept or redirect SSH traffic (e.g., via MITM, rogue server, or compromised network).
- No Prior Authentication: The attack does not require prior credentials or session hijacking.
- Client-Side Vulnerability: Only wolfSSH clients (≤1.4.21) are directly exploitable, but servers are also affected (though no known server-side attacks exist yet).
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
- A malicious SSH server could be set up to exploit this flaw.
- Network-level manipulation (e.g., ARP spoofing, DNS hijacking) increases attack surface.
- Automated exploitation tools may emerge, given the low complexity.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- wolfSSH versions ≤ 1.4.21 (client and server).
- Applications embedding wolfSSH (e.g., IoT devices, embedded systems, custom SSH clients).
Scope of Impact
- Clients: Any application using wolfSSH for SSH connections (e.g., automation scripts, IoT gateways, embedded Linux devices).
- Servers: While no direct server-side attacks are confirmed, the same state machine flaw exists, making them theoretically vulnerable to future exploits.
- Third-Party Integrations: Vendors using wolfSSH in their products (e.g., industrial control systems, automotive telematics) may be affected.
Non-Affected Systems
- OpenSSH, libssh, Dropbear, and other SSH implementations are not affected.
- wolfSSH ≥ 1.4.22 (patched version).
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Upgrade wolfSSH:
- Clients & Servers: Update to wolfSSH 1.4.22 or later (patch available in PR #855).
- Embedded Systems: Apply the patch and recompile firmware if wolfSSH is statically linked.
-
Rotate Credentials:
- Change passwords for all accounts that may have connected to untrusted SSH servers.
- Revoke and regenerate SSH keys if public-key authentication was used.
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Enforce SSH host key verification (prevent MITM attacks).
- Use VPNs or TLS tunneling for SSH traffic in untrusted networks.
- Deploy IDS/IPS rules to detect anomalous SSH traffic (e.g., unexpected KEX messages).
-
Temporary Workarounds (if patching is delayed):
- Disable wolfSSH-based clients and use alternative SSH implementations (e.g., OpenSSH).
- Restrict SSH access to trusted networks via firewalls.
Long-Term Recommendations
-
Security Audits:
- Review wolfSSH integrations in custom applications.
- Conduct penetration testing to identify vulnerable deployments.
-
Enhanced Monitoring:
- Log and alert on unusual SSH authentication attempts.
- Monitor for cleartext password transmission in network traffic.
-
Vendor Coordination:
- Check with third-party vendors (e.g., IoT manufacturers) for patches.
- Subscribe to wolfSSL security advisories for future updates.
5. Impact on the European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory and Compliance Implications
- NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555): Organizations in critical sectors (energy, transport, healthcare, digital infrastructure) must patch within strict timelines to avoid penalties.
- GDPR (EU 2016/679): If passwords or personal data are exposed, affected organizations may face fines up to 4% of global revenue.
- ENISA Guidelines: The vulnerability aligns with ENISA’s "Threat Landscape for Supply Chain Attacks", highlighting risks in open-source dependencies.
Sector-Specific Risks
| Sector | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Critical Infrastructure | Unauthorized access to industrial control systems (ICS) via compromised SSH clients. |
| Healthcare | Exposure of patient data if medical devices use vulnerable wolfSSH. |
| Financial Services | Credential theft leading to fraud or lateral movement in banking networks. |
| Automotive | Compromise of connected vehicle telematics systems. |
| Government | Espionage risks if government agencies use affected SSH clients. |
Supply Chain Risks
- Open-Source Dependency: wolfSSH is used in embedded systems, IoT devices, and custom applications, increasing the supply chain attack surface.
- Delayed Patching: Many organizations may lag in applying updates, prolonging exposure.
Threat Actor Interest
- APT Groups: State-sponsored actors may exploit this for espionage or sabotage.
- Cybercriminals: Likely to use this for credential harvesting and ransomware deployment.
- Script Kiddies: Low-complexity exploitation may lead to widespread opportunistic attacks.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from improper state management in wolfSSH’s key exchange (KEX) protocol. Specifically:
- State Machine Flaw: The KEX state machine does not properly validate transitions, allowing an attacker to force the client into an insecure state.
- Premature Authentication: The client may transmit credentials before encryption is established, leading to cleartext exposure.
- Signature Bypass: The state machine can be tricked into accepting invalid signatures, enabling authentication bypass.
Code-Level Details (from GitHub PR #855)
The patch (wolfSSH PR #855) introduces:
- Strict state validation in
wolfssh/src/kex.c. - Additional checks in
wolfssh/src/auth.cto prevent authentication skipping. - Enhanced error handling to reject malformed KEX messages.
Exploitation Technical Flow
-
Client Initiates SSH Handshake:
- Client sends
SSH_MSG_KEXINIT. - Server responds with its own
SSH_MSG_KEXINIT.
- Client sends
-
Attacker Manipulates KEX:
- The attacker (malicious server) sends a crafted
SSH_MSG_KEXDH_REPLYwith invalid parameters. - The client’s state machine fails to validate the transition, leading to premature credential transmission.
- The attacker (malicious server) sends a crafted
-
Credential Leakage:
- If using password authentication, the client sends the password in cleartext before encryption is established.
- If using public-key auth, the client may send a bogus signature or skip authentication entirely.
Detection and Forensics
- Network Traffic Analysis:
- Look for SSH sessions where credentials are sent before
SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS. - Monitor for unexpected KEX message sequences.
- Look for SSH sessions where credentials are sent before
- Log Analysis:
- Check wolfSSH logs for unusual state transitions or failed authentication attempts.
- Memory Forensics:
- In compromised clients, passwords may reside in memory before encryption.
Defensive Programming Recommendations
- State Machine Hardening:
- Implement strict state transition validation (e.g., using a state table with explicit allowed transitions).
- Early Encryption Enforcement:
- Ensure all authentication data is encrypted before transmission.
- Fuzz Testing:
- Use libFuzzer or AFL to test wolfSSH’s KEX state machine for edge cases.
Conclusion
EUVD-2026-0990 (CVE-2025-14942) is a critical vulnerability in wolfSSH that enables remote credential theft, authentication bypass, and session hijacking. Given its low attack complexity and high impact, organizations must patch immediately, rotate credentials, and implement network-level protections.
The flaw highlights the importance of secure state machine design in cryptographic protocols and underscores the risks of open-source dependencies in critical infrastructure. European organizations must align mitigation efforts with NIS2 and GDPR requirements to avoid regulatory penalties and cyber incidents.
Recommended Next Steps:
- Patch wolfSSH to ≥1.4.22.
- Rotate all credentials used with vulnerable clients.
- Monitor for exploitation attempts via IDS/IPS and log analysis.
- Conduct a supply chain audit to identify affected third-party products.